Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Victor Stitt

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 27, 2017No. 14-6158Published

1DissentSutton, Circuit Judge

There is an easy way to think about this case. And there is a more complicated way. Either way, Stitt’s conviction under Tennessee law for aggravated burglary counts as a “burglary” under the Armed Career Criminal Act.

The easy way. The Armed Career Criminal Act establishes a mandatory minimum sentence for firearm offenders who have three previous convictions for “violent felonies] or [] serious drug offense[s].” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). The Act lists “burglary” as a qualifying violent felony. Id. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). The relevant portion of Tennessee’s aggravated burglary statute applies to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Vance v. Ball State Univ.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. United States v. Willy Elmer SweetenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API