Legal Opinion

Hessig v. Hessig's Admr.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 27, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

CASE 82. — ACTION BY H. T. HESSIG AGAINST CATHERINE HESSIG’S ADMINISTRATOR AND OTHERS. — Appeal from McCracken Circuit Court. W. M. Seed, Circuit Judge. On motion to ex-tend an order granting a cross-appeal so as to apply to a person .not- a party to the appeal. —

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice O’Rear—

Denying motion.

The circuit court rendered a judgment partially in favor of Hessig’s guardian and partly disappointing to him. Both parties took exception to the judgment, and each prayed an appeal to this court. Appellant prosecuted the appeal in due season. Thereupon appellee, Hessig’s guardian, prayed and was granted a cross-appeal against the appellant. He now complains because the order did not also grant a cross-appeal against the Fidelity & Deposit Company, who was also a party in the circuit court, and who was a surety it is alleged upon the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Daviess County Court v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Henderson v. RedmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Matney v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  3. City of Pikeville v. DilsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Security Trust Co. v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Davis v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API