Legal Opinion

Cole v. Ruidoso Municipal Schools

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 29, 1991No. 91-2051PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Defendants appeal the district court’s denial of the portion of their Motion for Summary Judgment seeking qualified immunity on Plaintiff’s procedural due process claim. On appeal, Defendants argue that the district court erred in denying qualified immunity on Plaintiff’s procedural due process…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Ted P. Campbell v. Ernest Mercer, as Mayor of Elmore City, and as an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Hayden v. LeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cole v. Ruidoso Municipal SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. Cole v. Ruidoso Municipal SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API