Legal Opinion

Wood v. Ford Garage Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith (Edward N.), J.

The action is brought to recover damages on account of personal injuries claimed to have been caused by the negligence of the defendants. The amended answer of each of the defendants, after certain admissions here immaterial, sets up as a first defense a general denial of the allegations of the complaint, and as a second defense an allegation of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff.

For a third separate answer the defendants allege that the plaintiff was an employee of the United States of America by reason of his being a member of the Civilian Conservation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dahn v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Hines v. DahnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
  3. Turnquist v. HannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Barry v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Lassell v. City of GloversvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Owen v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. United States v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  3. Morgan v. WoodruffCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Lake v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Wagner v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API