Legal Opinion

Gray v. Shipley

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided April 21, 1994No. 01-94-00304-CVPublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Relator, Larry L. Gray, has filed a pro se motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus. He is charged by indictment with possession of a controlled substance.

Relator seeks the writ of mandamus so that “the validity of a warrantless arrest with no probable cause justifying arrest be ruled upon to determine if further prosecution of relator may be continued.” Relator is represented by appointed counsel in the trial court. Relator is not entitled to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex.Crim.App.1981).

Accordingly, we overrule relator’s motion for leave…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rudd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

4Cited by147 opinions

  1. In re FlaniganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2019
  2. in Re Dan Vernon West, Relator, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
  3. Ex Parte Barry A. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
  4. Ex Parte Cecil Burley v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2025
  5. Ex Parte Cecil Burley v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2025

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API