Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Nice

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 17, 1981No. 80-186, 80-187Published

1Dissent

I have thought long and searchingly upon what I here say in dissent lest I appear overly alarmed. While I hope this reflection results in a measure of self-imposed restraint, nevertheless, I am constrained to speak forcibly and forthrightly against the majority opinion; which I believe constitutes a most serious and dangerous erosion of our judicial system.

By a bare majority, whether wittingly or unwittingly, this Court has abolished the distinction between review by extraordinary writs of mandamus and by appeals. The restricted office of mandamus, until today, was well defined and well…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Hudson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Ex Parte WeissingerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. State Board of Administration v. RoquemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. East v. ToddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API