Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thomas J. O'Brien v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 2017No. 27Published

1DissentRivera, J.

The majority’s conclusion that triable factual issues preclude summary judgment for the plaintiff reflects a misunderstanding of the legislative intent and statutory mandates of Labor Law § 240 (1). Section 240 is a “self-executing statute . . . containing its own specific safety measures” (Zimmer v Chemung County Performing Arts, 65 NY2d 513, 522 [1985]), and subdivision (1) places ultimate responsibility for safety practices at construction sites on the property owner and general contractor (id. at 520). One of the core principles of our section 240 (1) jurisprudence is that it would…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Blake v. Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API