Legal Opinion

State v. LaFountain

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 28, 2017No. A16-1754PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JESSON, Judge

Appellant Adam LaFountain appeals his felony conviction, arguing that the requirement of the Minnesota predatory-offender-registration statute that he inform law enforcement of his address change violates his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Because the predatory-offender-registration act is not a penal statute, it does not implicate the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. Further, because LaFountain’s statements to the investigator were made when he was not in custody, they are not covered within the scope of that privilege. We…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Lloyd AschbrennerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. Nathan Alexander Jefferson v. Drew EvansCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  3. State of Iowa v. Lloyd AschbrennerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API