State v. LaFountain
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JESSON, Judge
Appellant Adam LaFountain appeals his felony conviction, arguing that the requirement of the Minnesota predatory-offender-registration statute that he inform law enforcement of his address change violates his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Because the predatory-offender-registration act is not a penal statute, it does not implicate the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. Further, because LaFountain’s statements to the investigator were made when he was not in custody, they are not covered within the scope of that privilege. We…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Lloyd AschbrennerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Nathan Alexander Jefferson v. Drew EvansCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Iowa v. Lloyd AschbrennerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019