Moore v. Shulman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied, Labor Law § 240 (1) claim reinstated and cross motion granted. Memorandum: Plaintiff was hired to assist in converting five utility vans into cargo vans. The vans had been purchased by defendant Owl Surplus, Inc. (Owl Surplus) from Rochester Telephone. Some of the vans had a hydraulically-operated manlift, which consisted of a 600-pound pedestal bolted to the floor of the van and a boom that projected from the interior of the van up through a hole in the roof. Defendant Donald Clark, an employee of Owl Surplus, affixed a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Gordon v. Eastern Railway Supply, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Joblon v. SolowNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Smith v. Shell Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Lewis-Moors v. Contel of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cornacchione v. Clark Concrete Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Spears v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- McCoy v. KirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Hodges v. Boland's Excavating & Topsoil, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Haines v. Dick's Concrete Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.