Lipin v. Salkin

Defendant, Salkin, moves for an order requiring plaintiff to serve an amended complaint in which each distinct cause of action shall be separately stated and numbered and in which various allegations of the present pleading shall be made more definite and certain. In addition, the movant asks that other allegations of the instant complaint be omitted therefrom as irrelevant, redundant, unnecessary and prejudicial.

The first cause of action combines allegations that Salkin induced plaintiff, by false representations, to make him trustee of a trust for plaintiff’s benefit (pars. Eighteenth to…