Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2005No. 20030566PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEHRING, Justice:

¶ 1 Bryan Keith Taylor appeals his conviction for rape of a child. He challenges the trial court’s refusal to grant him a continuance after the State amended its information. He also challenges what he claims to be the trial court’s erroneous comments on the evidence in its jury instruction about victim consent. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Mr. Taylor was accused of raping a six-year-old girl that he was babysitting. He was charged with one count each of rape of a child, sodomy upon a child, and sexual abuse of a child. 1 The State’s information alleged that the charged offenses…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State v. FontanaUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. Nelson-WaggonerUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. RobbinsUtah Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. CruzUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. PullmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  3. State v. MackinUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. CruzCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  5. State v. WarehamCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API