Legal Opinion

Doe v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 22, 2020No. 19-911Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-911 Filed: May 6, 2020 Reissued: May 22, 20201 ) JOHN DOE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) RCFC 12(b)(1); Motion to Dismiss; ) Subject-Matter Jurisdiction; Tucker Act; v. ) 28 U.S.C. § 1491; Statute of Limitations; ) 28 U.S.C. § 2501; Equitable Tolling; John THE UNITED STATES, ) R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States, )

552 U.S. 130

(2008); Accrual Suspension Defendant. ) Rule; Time-Barred. ) Christopher Samuel Morris, Morris Law Firm, APC, San Diego, CA, for plaintiff. Joseph Alan Pixley, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, DC, for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API