Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Carrothers

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1911No. 17,293PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Sumner district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action to recover an award of $180 made by fence viewers after a view of a hedge, fence 160 rods long which had grown .between *94the fax-ms of appellant and appellees. It appears that the hedge was planted by the predecessor in title of appellant, about thirty-five years ago, and, not being trimmed, Osage orange trees had grown in it large enough for telephone poles, fence and corral posts. The viewers, called under the fence law, divided the fence and assigned the north half of it to appellant as the share to be kept up by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guyer v. StrattonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  2. Miles v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Scott v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  4. Voelz v. BreitenfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wideman v. FaivreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Kaplan v. Board of Johnson County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API