Legal Opinion

Hester v. Hubbuch

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 27, 1942No. 14PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

In an effort to make a clear statement of the case, we shall refer to the parties as they appeared in the court below.

Suit was brought by the plaintiff Margaret Hester to recover for personal injuries sustained by her. A separate suit was brought by her husband, A. 0. Hester, for medical expenses and loss of her services. The injuries complained of were caused by a piece of vitrolite or structural glass falling from a store front and striking Margaret Hester, who was passing along the street.

The suits are against Otto J. Hubbuch, doing business as the Hubbuch Glass Company, the sub-contractor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simms v. KennedySupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Stenberg v. WillcoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Dupont Rayon Co. v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
  4. Lee v. McLaughlinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smith v. Inman Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  2. Hill v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
  3. Johnson v. Oman Construction Company, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Francis Ione Lethcoe v. Ricky Ray Holden, et uxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. Evens v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API