Legal Opinion

214 Associates v. Teitlebaum

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided December 30, 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David B. Saxe, J.

The issue that I must resolve in the context of this holdover proceeding tried without a jury is as follows: When a prime tenant rents a large number of apartments (i.e., 10) in a multiple dwelling, and then sublets an apartment to the respondent for living purposes in violation of the terms of the lease between the prime tenant and the landlord (because the subtenants were not employees of the prime tenant), are the respondents, at the expiration of the sublease, entitled to a renewal lease from the landlord in accordance with guidelines established by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. 520 East 81st Street Associates v. Lenox Hill HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. 520 East 81st Street Associates v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1974
  3. 520 East 81st Street Associates v. Lenox Hill HospitalCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
  4. 520 East 81st Street Associates v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API