Legal Opinion

Frey v. Sylvester

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1898Published

Motion to strike out answer as sham.

1Opinion of the CourtHiscock, J.

This action is brought to recover the sum of $526.12, claimed to be due from defendant to plaintiff for beer sold by the latter and his assignor. ■

The answer served does not deny the indebtedness or any allegations of the complaint. In fact, it expressly admits> the accruing of a large portion at least of the indebtedness. It does not, therefore, come within the rule which prohibits striking out as sham, an answer which by general or specific denials of allegations in the complaint raises issues to be tried. Robert Gere Bank v. Inman, 51 Hun, 97.

It, upon the other hand, sets up what purport…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Albany County Bank v. RiderNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  2. First National Bank v. SlatteryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Commercial Bank of Rochester v. . SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API