Legal Opinion

Kohn v. Kelly

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 8, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On bill to foreclose usurious mortgage.

1Opinion of the Court

Leaming, Y. C.

The single question here presented is whether our statute against usury entitles defendant to a deduction from the amount actually loaned of all interest which has been paid by him, or only entitles him to a deduction of the amount of illegal interest paid by him.

I am unable to consider this an open question in this state. In all cases in which the subject appears to have been directly considered the view has been uniformly adopted that the statutory deduction from the amount actually loaned of interest already paid is of the interest which has been paid in excess of the legal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lowenthal v. MyersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kobrin v. HullNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  2. Goldberg v. FisherSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Colleran v. WallNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API