Legal Opinion
Nix v. Spector Freight System, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 28, 1960PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
62 N.J. Super. 213 (1960)
162 A.2d 590
WILLIAM A. NIX (AND 32 OTHERS), PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
SPECTOR FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 28, 1960.
Decided June 28, 1960.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and FREUND.
Mr. John J. Bracken argued the cause for appellants, together with Mr. Alfred W. Blumrosen, of the Michigan Bar, admitted pro hac vice (Messrs. Bracken & Walsh, attorneys).
Mr. Herbert Burstein, of the New York Bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondent Spector Freight System, Inc. (Messrs.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jorgensen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- IND. DAIRY WORKERS UNION OF HIGHTSTOWN v. Milk Drivers and Dairy Employees Local No. 680Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- O'BRIEN v. Dade Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Nix v. Spector Freight System, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bonhiver v. GraffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Galligan v. Westfield Centre Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- W v. Pangborne & Co. v. New Jersey Department of TransportationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Fleming v. UPSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Security Construction Co. v. MaiettaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.