Watts v. Seward School Board
Alaska Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceRabino Witz, Justice
I concur in the majority’s conclusion that appellant Blue’s talk to the Seward longshoremen was not immoral conduct. I dissent from the majority’s determination that appellant Watts’ solicitation of his fellow teachers, the Framptons, constituted immorality; from the decision that both appellants “were guilty of immorality * * * for their part in compiling, reproducing and distributing the Open Letter”; and I also dissent from the majority’s holding that appellants “were guilty of substantial noncompliance with Board Regulation E (7).”
AS TO APPELLANTS’ IMMORALITY IN THE COMPILATION,…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.