Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Matter of Discipline of Simpson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1991No. 17048Published

1ConcurrenceHenderson, Justice

(specially concurring).

Although I agree with the ultimate discipline in this case, I enter a written concurrence, inter alia, for the reason that there are no South Dakota citations by way of Supreme Court decisions set forth herein. Therefore, a reliance upon settled authority in this Court is open for question. In my opinion, this should not be.

The purpose of disciplinary proceedings is not to punish but to remove from the profession those attorneys whose misconduct has proven them unfit to be entrusted with the duties and responsibilities belonging to the office of an attorney so that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WeikerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Matter of Discipline of StantonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In Re the Discipline of RudeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Matter of Reinstatement of HusbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re WeisenseeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API