Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Heidenheimer Bros. v. Blumenkron

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1882No. Case No. 783PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from Galveston. Tried below before the Hon. Wm. H. Stewart. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Gould, Chief Justice.—

On December 22, 1874, Heidenheimer Bros, sued J. Blumenkron, Herman Hirsch and S. Heidenheimer on the following promissory note:

“$1,418.24. Galveston, June 1, 1873.
“Six months after date I promise to pay to the order of myself fourteen hundred and eighteen -fits dollars, value received, payable at--

(Signed) “J. Blumenkron.

“Indorsed:
“J. Blumenkron,
“Herman Hirsch,
“S. Heidenheimer.”

The petition sought to charge Hirsch and S. Heidenheimer not as indorsers, but as co-obligors with Blumenkron as his sureties. It was alleged and shown that Blumenkron being indebted to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rey v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Burton & Co. v. HansfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Carr's Ex'ix v. RowlandTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Cook v. SouthwickTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Horton v. ManningTexas Supreme Court · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Simmang v. Pennsylvania Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. First Nat. Bank of Midland v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Blucher v. EubankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Hammond v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Mueller v. RichardsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API