Legal Opinion

Simunov v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 5, 1947No. 10433PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon appeal from an order denying a motion for the vacation or correction of a sentence, it appears that the appellant was convicted and sentenced for bank robbery under Title 12 U.S.C.A. Section 588b (a) and Section 588c. The indictment contained four counts charging the appellant with entering a bank with intent to commit a felony, stealing from the bank, putting the life of a bank officer in jeopardy by the use of a dangerous weapon and attempting to avoid apprehension by forcing a bank officer to accompany him without the consent of such officer.

Notwithstanding our numerous admonitions…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. TateoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  3. United States v. James Earl Fleming, Jr., Henry Lee Fleming and Tommie Earl MillenderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Antonio Pino PalafoxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Eneliko Fatu FaleafineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API