Legal Opinion
Tilsac Corp. v. Assessor of Huntington
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1967PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
John P. Cohalan, Jr., J.
In this tax certiorari proceeding petitioner Tilsac has attacked its assessment for the tax years 1963-1964 and 196L-1965 on the double grounds of inequality and overvaluation.
The subject real property, known as 1 The Big H ’ shopping center is situate on New York Avenue, at Huntington, in Suffolk County. It occupies approximately 25 acres, seven of which are unimproved. The latter are separated from the improved portion by a Sears Roebuck store not privy to this proceeding.
*432For each of the two years under review the assessment is: Land $75,300. Total $586,800.
The rate…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Adams Express Co. v. Ohio State AuditorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Heiman v. BishopNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- People Ex Rel. Parklin Operating Corp. v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- People Ex Rel. Hotel Paramount Corp. v. ChambersNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- People Ex Rel. Warren v. . CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Slewett & Farber v. Board of Assessors of County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Standard Brands, Inc. v. WalshNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Slewett & Farber v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- ACO Realty Corp. v. SrogiNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- In re the Estate of NennoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1971