Harris v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mercier, Judge.
Following a bench trial, Alfred Harris, Jr. was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol. Harris appeals his conviction, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.
"The State bears the burden of proving that both the search and seizure of evidence were lawful." Lucas v. State , 284 Ga. App. 450, 451, 644 S.E.2d 302 (2007) (citation and punctuation omitted). "When the evidence at a suppression hearing is uncontroverted and the credibility of witnesses is not in question, we conduct a de novo review…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Heien v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Gary v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Thomason v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- State v. MussmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WareOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- People v. GerberdingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020