Cricket Hosiery, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Musgrave, Senior Judge:
Plaintiffs bring this action challenging the constitutionality of the imposition and collection of fees on imports of cotton and cotton products pursuant to the Cotton Research and Promotion Act of 1966 (“Cotton Act”), 7 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq. The Complaint avers that this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i)(l), (2), and (4). The government moves to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction contending that the Cotton Act specifies the district court in which Plaintiffs have their principal place of business as the proper forum for an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Vivitar Corporation v. The United States, and 47th Street Photo, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Orleans International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Cornet Stores v. Azie Taylor Morton, Treasurer of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Shabahang Persian Carpets, Ltd.United States Court of International Trade · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.