Legal Opinion

Holt v. James

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1909No. Civ. No. 684PublishedCited by 3 opinions

PETITION for writ of prohibition to restrain the enforcement of an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. W. P. James, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Application for writ of prohibition.

It is made to appear by the record filed herein that in a certain action pending in the superior court .of Los Angeles county, entitled R. L. Couts, plaintiff, v. H. R. Holt, defends ant, a writ of attachment had been duly issued and levied upon certain personal property; that said superior court duly made and entered its judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant for $631; that thereafter, within due time, an undertaking on appeal was filed, and an additional undertaking to stay execution; that thereafter, on the twenty-ninth day of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Southern California Railway Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Roark v. KoelschIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Fix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API