King v. Syracuse, Lake Shore & Northern Railroad
New York County Courts
Appeal from City Court of Fulton. Action by Arvilla King against the Syracuse, Lake Shore & Northern Railroad Company. From a judgment in the City Court for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtRowe, J.
Appeal from a judgment of the City Court of the City of Fulton for $50.05 and costs for a penalty and excessive fare under section 59 of the railroad law.
[1] Defendant is a street surface railroad, and the first question raised herein is whether section 59 of the railroad law is applicable. Although defendant under the law is a street surface railroad, it maintains a line running through the country from Syracuse to Fulton, and for the safety and convenience of the public it would seem that all the general provisions of article 3 of the railroad law should apply to such a railroad. All the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murtagh v. DempseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Vandeymark v. CorbettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Brewer v. CaliffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Clinton v. FrearAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- McRavy v. BartoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- King v. Syracuse, L. S. & N. R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913