Legal Opinion

State v. Manard

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 17, 1984No. 13512PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Presiding Judge.

Appellant Paige Tedford Manard and Raymond John Dieckmeyer were jointly charged with the sale of cocaine in violation of § 195.020. The charges were later severed. The appellant waived his right to a trial by jury. By agreement, the state submitted the charge against the appellant upon the written report of a police officer and a laboratory report. The defendant offered no evidence. Without prematurely foreclosing the appellant’s second point, the court found him guilty and sentenced him to imprisonment for 10 years. He presents two points on appeal.

The written evidence…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Willie H. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. Dillingham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wickline v. CasteelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. State v. McNealMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Manard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API