Legal Opinion

Hellman v. City of Covington

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 25, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge.

Frank L. Heilman et al., representing more than 50% of the resident freeholders, remonstrated against a proposed annexation by the City of Covington. They appeal from the judgment permitting the annexation. On appeal they contend that the record fails to establish the requisites of KRS 81.110(2). It is also contended that the description of the annexed territory is inadequate and the record does not show that the ordinance of annexation received the requisite two-thirds vote of the city governing body.

The trial judge heard and decided the case without the intervention of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  2. Village of Cote Brilliante v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. City of Greenville v. GossettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962
  4. Voorhes v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hopperton v. City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API