Legal Opinion

Sutton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 16, 1990No. Nos. 87-00933, 87-01774PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALTENBERND, Judge.

The defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Sutton, pled nolo contendere to various drug charges and reserved the right to appeal the denial of a dispositive motion to suppress evidence derived from a wiretap. We reverse because the wiretap was improperly authorized on stale evidence. The good faith exception does not allow the use of this evidence. State v. Garcia, 547 So.2d 628 (Fla.1989).

The sworn application for an order authorizing interception of communications from the defendants’ home telephone was filed on June 30, 1986, and the order authorizing interception was entered on that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bernie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  4. Hudson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. State v. BernieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Florida Department of Law Enforcement v. LazzaraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Pappas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API