Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. City of Portland

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 16, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01126Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MARK DICKERSON, Case No. 3:19-cv-01126-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. CITY OF PORTLAND; MULTNOMAH COUNTY; MATT JACOBSEN; and JOHN DOES 1-15, Defendants. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Mark Dickerson (“Dickerson”), a self-represented litigant, filed this action against the City of Portland (the “City”), Multnomah County (the “County”), John Does 1-10, who are Portland Police Bureau (“PPB”) law enforcement officers (the “Officers”) and supervisors, John Does 11-15, who are employees of the Multnomah County District…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API