Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Matthews

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 25, 1983No. 83-60PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Pursuant to a written contract, appellant built a home for the appellees. The undisputed evidence established that the concrete foundation was poured in water and mud. When the ground dried, the foundation cracked and the house settled, creating numerous other defects in the house. Appellees’ house was repaired at a cost of approximately $19,000.

The appellees filed suit, initially on a theory of breach of an implied warranty that the house was to be constructed with sound workmanship and proper construction. Before trial the complaint was amended by alleging a breach of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  2. T. H. Epperson & Son, Inc. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. O'Guinn Volkswagen, Inc. v. LawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pineview Farms, Inc. v. A.O. Smith Harvestore, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Grayson & Grayson, P.A. v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API