Legal Opinion

Koenig v. Delotte Haskins & Sells

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 16, 1985No. 84-2499PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We hold that a settlement with one plaintiff is record activity calculated to hasten a cause to resolution, and therefore it was *306error for the trial court to dismiss the cause as to a remaining plaintiff because of alleged nonactivity pursuant to Rule 1.420, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. See and Compare Eastern Elevator, Inc., v. Page, 263 So.2d 218 (Fla.1972); Nektaredes v. Sagonias, 432 So.2d 769 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Marschall v. Water-Boggan International, Inc., 401 So.2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); DeVaney v. Rumsch, 247 So.2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971).

The order under review dismissing the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eastern Elevator, Inc. v. PageSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  2. DeVaney v. RumschDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. Nektaredes v. SagoniasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Marschall v. WATER-BOGGAN INTERN., INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission v. Emerald Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Valdes v. PerezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API