Legal Opinion

State v. Hayden

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 28, 1977No. 20368PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice:

The three appellants were convicted and sentenced for certain drug and illegal weapons charges.

The facts from which the charges arose are as follows:

At about 7 o’clock p. m. on January 8, 1975, the appellants, David Michael Hayden and James M. Martin, were in the apartment of a SLED informer in Columbia. The informer had earlier agreed to buy cocaine from them and loaned James M. Martin his automobile to go to Charleston for the purpose of procuring the same. This was the culmination of previous conversations relative to this matter. James M. Martin left for Charleston in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  4. State v. HaulcombSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DasherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Hayden v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. BendolySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  5. Hayden v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API