Legal Opinion

Tesseyman v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided April 6, 1960No. Claim No. 36769PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles T. Major, J.

The claimant made a motion returnable on November 10, 1959, for an order changing the venue and transferring the trial to the New York District. The State of New York made a cross motion returnable on December 14, 1959, for an order pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice dismissing the claim herein on the ground that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject of the action and that the claim does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Both motions were adjourned to and argued together on December 17,1959.

T…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nastasi v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Douglas v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Douglas v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  4. Jameison v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1956
  5. Farrell v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Makin v. WalterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  2. Glynn v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1965
  3. People v. BarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API