Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Cain

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 12, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01369Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RONALD NELSON CHANDLER, Case No. 2:23-cv-01369-AN Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER v. BRAD CAIN, Respondent. Ronald Nelson Chandler 2193705 Snake River Correctional Institution 777 Stanton Blvd. Ontario, OR 97914-8335 Petitioner, Pro Se Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General Daniel T. Toulson, Assistant Attorney General Department of Justice 1162 Court Street NE Salem, Oregon 97310 Attorneys for Respondent NELSON, District Judge. Petitioner brings this habeas corpus case pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

challenging the legality of his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.