Legal Opinion
State v. Connor
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1993No. 20023Published
1Opinion of the Court
861 P.2d 1212 (1993)
124 Idaho 547
STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robert CONNOR, Defendant-Respondent.
No. 20023.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, March 1993 Term.
July 9, 1993.
Larry EchoHawk, Atty. Gen., Thomas P. Watkins, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-appellant. Thomas P. Watkins, argued.
Timothy J. Williams, Twin Falls, for defendant-respondent.
JOHNSON, Justice.
This is a criminal case. The first issue presented is whether the trial court had sufficient evidence upon which to base a finding that the accused had an objectively reasonable belief that he would be terminated from his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Robert S. FriedrickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- State v. RushoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. CulbertsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.