Acme Builders, Inc. v. Facilities Development Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. Trial Term, after considering the contract, accompanying documents and extrinsic evidence, found that plaintiff was required to paint the entire existing boiler room at the Woodbourne Rehabilitation Center. It cannot be said that this finding, affirmed by the Appellate Division, was erroneous as a matter of law.
There is no merit to plaintiff’s contention that as a matter of law the contract required the painting of only those areas of the boiler room disturbed by its construction work. The…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Lake Construction & Development Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Thalle Construction Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Arnell Construction Corp. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Delidakis Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2005
- Lakhi General Contractor, Inc. v. New York City School Construction AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.