Legal Opinion
Castellano v. Board of Trustees of the Police Officer's Variable Supplements Fund
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 9, 1990No. 89 Civ. 3272 (KTD)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENDORSEMENT
KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Peter R. Castellano et al. (“Castellano”), former police officers, former police superior officers, and former police detectives who retired on accident disability, ordinary disability, or with a vested right to a deferred retirement allowance, bring action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982) against defendants, Board of Trustees of the Police Officer’s Variable Supplements Fund, Board of Trustees of the Police Superior Officers’ Supplements Fund, Harrison J. Goldin, and The City of New York (“Board of Trustees”), claiming deprivation…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Castellano v. Board of Trustees of the Police Officers' Variable Supplements FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Peter R.. Castellano v. Board Of Trustees Of The Police Officers' Variable Supplements FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Bergamine v. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of the City of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994