Legal Opinion
Pugh v. Hartford Insurance Group
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1972PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames H. Boomer, J.
The plaintiff Woodrow Pugh brings this action for a judgment declaring that he is entitled to coverage under an automobile liability insurance policy issued by the defendant Hartford Insurance Group to the defendant Jenthal Joseph.
The facts are not in dispute. The defendant Hartford Insurance Group had issued a policy of automobile liability insurance to the defendant Jenthal Joseph covering a 1962 Rambler automobile owned by her. On October 8, 1969 the plaintiff, while driving this automobile, became involved in an accident which caused injuries to one Palmer Smith. Palmer Smith brought an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Semple v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Motors Insurance Corporation v. Safeco Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
- Hayes v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1967
- SOUTHERN FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. TealDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1968
- Musso v. American Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. of IllinoisNew York Supreme Court · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fulater v. Palmer's Granite Garage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- United States v. Arthur CantonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Blackmer v. Travelers Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1981
- Janos Horvath, Jr. v. Lindenhurst Auto Salvage, Inc., Regina Verre-Weissbach and Frank BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Genesee Regional Bank v. PalumboNew York Supreme Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.