Legal Opinion

Tomala v. Peerless Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The question here presented is whether a policy of automobile liability insurance was in force and effect at the time of the happening of an accident on July 4,1958.

The plaintiff sued one, Thomas Britton, for damages arising from that automobile accident. The defendant carrier disclaimed liability and refused to defend Britton claiming that its policy had been cancelled. Following an inquest, the plaintiff was awarded judgment on December 21, 1958 in the amount of $6,786 plus costs. Thereafter the plaintiff brought this action *208under section 167 of the Insurance Law and recovered a judgment…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. KinsellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Skibeck Pipeline Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. American Mutual Insurance v. KleinNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Dembitzer v. GilliamNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Samuel Taylor v. Joseph A. Kinsella and the New York Post, and the Hertz Corporation, the Hertz Corporation, Third Party v. Centennial Insurance Company, Third Party and News Group Publications, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API