Hill v. Nationwide Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
This appeal raises the question of whether the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL) provides an adequate and complete statutory remedy that precludes equity jurisdiction in an action by an insured against, his insurer for first-party medical benefits to cover ongoing treatment. We conclude that in this situation, the MVFRL does not preclude equity jurisdiction.
This is an appeal from a final decree in equity directing appellant, Nationwide Insurance Company (Nationwide), to pay to appellee, David Hill, past and future medical benefits in connection with an automobile…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Pelagatti v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Hayes v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Harris-Walsh, Inc. v. Dickson City BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Pennsylvania State Chamber of Commerce v. TorquatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pentlong Corp. v. GLS Capital, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Gall v. CrawfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Philipsburg-Osceola Education Ass'n v. Philipsburg-Osceola Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- County of Dauphin v. City of HarrisburgCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Nationwide Insurance v. Hoch, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.