Legal Opinion

Hill v. Nationwide Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 1990No. 3534PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This appeal raises the question of whether the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL) provides an adequate and complete statutory remedy that precludes equity jurisdiction in an action by an insured against, his insurer for first-party medical benefits to cover ongoing treatment. We conclude that in this situation, the MVFRL does not preclude equity jurisdiction.

This is an appeal from a final decree in equity directing appellant, Nationwide Insurance Company (Nationwide), to pay to appellee, David Hill, past and future medical benefits in connection with an automobile…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Pelagatti v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Hayes v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Harris-Walsh, Inc. v. Dickson City BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Pennsylvania State Chamber of Commerce v. TorquatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pentlong Corp. v. GLS Capital, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Gall v. CrawfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Philipsburg-Osceola Education Ass'n v. Philipsburg-Osceola Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. County of Dauphin v. City of HarrisburgCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Nationwide Insurance v. Hoch, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API