Legal Opinion

Blake v. City of Brooklyn

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1857PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from an order made at a special term, denying a motion for an injunction, and discharging an order for a temporary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Emott, J.

The complaint in this action seems to have been framed to restrain the proceedings of the defendants in filling up a portion of the plaintiff’s lots, and to vacate the assessment laid for the expense of this filling, as an improper exercise of authority or discretion; although in the argument before us the chief stress was laid upon the unconstitutionality of the ordinance complained of, or the law under which it was made. In any aspect of the question, however, I am quite clear that no case is disclosed upon these papers which demands or justifies the interposition of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mayor of Brooklyn v. MeseroleNew York Supreme Court · 1841
  2. Bouton v. City of BrooklynNew York Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crescent Mining Co. v. Silver King Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Thorn v. SweeneyNevada Supreme Court · 1877
  3. McGregor v. Silver King Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Brush v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
  5. In re BridgfordNew York Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API