Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clark v. Leverett

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 16, 1924No. 4329Published

1Dissent

Russell, C. J., and Gilbert, J.,

dissenting. So far as we *497are aware, the authorities generally agree that, unless the instrument creating the estate so requires, or there is an agreement between the interested parties obligating him to do so, the lifetenaut is not bound to insure the premises for the benefit of the remainderman, and either may insure for his own benefit. It is also generally agreed that if the insurance is taken out by the owners of the fee prior to the creation of the life-estate and the premises are destroyed by fire, the life-tenant is only entitled to his pro rata share of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harrison v. PepperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. Howard v. CasselsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Sampson v. GroganSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1899
  4. Russell v. KearneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
  5. Burke & Williams v. MackenzieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API