Legal Opinion

State v. Barnett

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 28, 1987No. 1 CA-CR 10324PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

The defendant, Marshall R. Barnett, was charged with one count of sale of a narcotic drug, a class two felony. He entered into a plea agreement in which he agreed to plead guilty to one count of possession of a narcotic drug. The plea agreement stipulated that the state would not allege prior convictions and that the defendant would be placed on probation. The court found that the defendant’s guilty plea was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made. Sentencing was set and a presentence report was prepared. The defendant admitted his guilt to the probation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Roy Harding Gallington and Wilbur Eugene StreeterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. Marcel BourqueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Charles BunchCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. State v. SotoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chavez v. SUPERIOR COURT CTY. OF MARICOPACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. Lopez v. KEARNEY EX REL. COUNTY OF PIMACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. Gerardo Lopez v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. State v. HanesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API