Legal Opinion

Tapley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 28, 1962No. 39404PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Frankum, Judge.

“On a prosecution under Code § 13-9933, for passing worthless checks, the intent to defraud cannot be presumed until it is shown by the evidence that the defendant did not have sufficient funds in or credit with the bank upon which the check was drawn to pay it at the time it was presented for payment.”1 Crain v. State, 78 Ga. App. 806 (52 SE2d 577). And to prove intent to defraud there must be a presentment of the check to the bank for payment, or other evidence from which an intent to defraud could be inferred. Crosby v. State, 83 Ga. App. 682 (64 SE2d 595); Spivey v. State,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Crain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Downs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Cosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  5. Spivey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hardeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API