Legal Opinion

United States v. Jane Boyd

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 24, 2021No. 19-55585PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-55585 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. V. 2:18-cv-00803- MWF-JEM JANE BoyD, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted September 1, 2020 Pasadena, California Filed March 24, 2021 Before: Sandra S. Ikuta and Mark J. Bennett, Circuit Judges, and Douglas Woodlock,* District Judge. Opinion by Judge Bennett; Dissent by Judge Ikuta * The Honorable Douglas P.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. California Bankers Assn. v. ShultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bittner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
  2. United States v. James D. PaulsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. United States v. Timberly HughesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  4. State of Alaska v. HaalandDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022
  5. United States v. BittnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API