Legal Opinion

Frausto v. Frausto

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 26, 1980No. 16438PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLINGEMAN, Justice.

This is a divorce action but the appeal herein pertains to the trial court’s division of the properties between the parties. Appellant, Manuel Jesus Frausto, complains only of an order in the divorce decree which requires him to pay to appellee, Maria Lourdes Frausto, the sum of $20,000, payable in the amount of $200 per month, “as a part of the division of the estate of the parties and as reimbursement for petitioner’s share of the community expense for respondent’s education.” 1

By a number of points of error appellant asserts that the trial court erred in holding…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hedtke v. HedtkeTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Dakan v. DakanTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Eggemeyer v. EggemeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Stern v. SternSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  5. Cooper v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. StepterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  2. Saint-Pierre v. Saint-PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Mahoney v. MahoneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. In Re the Marriage of WashburnWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API