Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Garter

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Peter P. Cusick, J.

The City’s application, under the Nuisance Abatement Law *598(Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-701 et seq.), to close the subject premises based upon an alleged violation of the adult use provisions of the New York City Zoning Resolution, as amended, is denied.

Although the “entertainment” provided by the subject premises involves erotica, there is no contention that it is legally obscene. This form of expression or “speech”, therefore, is fully protected from unjustified governmental interference by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Jenkins v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Parkview Associates v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Albano v. KirbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mathews v. GaryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. City of New York v. GarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API