Friedman v. Martini Tile & Terrazzo Company
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BOYD, Justice.
Following their declination 'to amend after the court sustained exceptions filed by appellee Martini Tile & Terrazzo Company, Inc., to their petition, the suit of appellants Mrs. Mabel Friedman and Sako-witz Bros, was dismissed. Hence this appeal. -
Since the appeal relates solely to the question of the sufficiency of the petition to gtate a cause, or causes, of action, it is necessary to set out the pleadings in some detail.
Appellants alleged:
“Sakowitz Bros, did on February 9, 1953 and does now maintain in the City of Houston a retail merchandising establishment occupying…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bradshaw v. Baylor UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Chicago v. BabcockIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Austin Road Co. v. PopeTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Wheeler v. GlazerTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1949
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Palestine Contractors, Inc. v. PerkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Kelly, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1984
- Peeler v. Hughes & Luce, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- Duke v. Brookshire Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Unitrust, Inc. v. Jet Fleet Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.