Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Martini Tile & Terrazzo Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 18, 1957No. 15767PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, Justice.

Following their declination 'to amend after the court sustained exceptions filed by appellee Martini Tile & Terrazzo Company, Inc., to their petition, the suit of appellants Mrs. Mabel Friedman and Sako-witz Bros, was dismissed. Hence this appeal. -

Since the appeal relates solely to the question of the sufficiency of the petition to gtate a cause, or causes, of action, it is necessary to set out the pleadings in some detail.

Appellants alleged:

“Sakowitz Bros, did on February 9, 1953 and does now maintain in the City of Houston a retail merchandising establishment occupying…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. Baylor UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. City of Chicago v. BabcockIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Austin Road Co. v. PopeTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Wheeler v. GlazerTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1949

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Palestine Contractors, Inc. v. PerkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Kelly, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1984
  3. Peeler v. Hughes & Luce, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  4. Duke v. Brookshire Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Unitrust, Inc. v. Jet Fleet Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API